Focus on ceasefire and war in Monland
By Taing Taw
The critical time
has come for the New Mon State Party to decide if it is to attend the
upcoming National Convention in October as an observer or participant.
The New Mon State Party is finding it harder to maintain its ceasefire
agreement with the SPDC and, party leaders now debate on its
relationship with the regime.
The NMSP’s’
President General Htow Mon has pointed out the many shortcomings of the
ceasefire and the government’s reluctance to implement the peace process
or renegotiate any part of it over the last few months, meanwhile the
Secretary General Nai Hongsar is seen as aligned with pro-exile groups
and rarely travels inside Burma even though his party had reached a
ceasefire with the SPDC.
The party sees the
NC as bearing no fruit for national reconciliation prompting senior
leaders from inside and outside of the country to meet in the heart of
the jungle to take stock of the situation and evaluate the ceasefire
process. Mon people will be paying particular attention to the outcome
of any decision taken by the party on how to proceed in the struggle for
Mon independence.
Neither maintaining
the peace resistance nor fighting for independence is seen as bringing a
solution to the political deadlock in Burma . However, Mon political
observers say that the breaking of the ceasefire is not the answer. We
have spent the last decade improving some services they say and point
out two developments: education and health care. Life would become more
difficult for the civilian population with the resumption of fighting
and would adversely affect the education and health care in the Mon
areas. Young people would be the victims of civil war as they have in
Karen area where young people bore the brunt of hostilities.
After the ceasefire
in 1995 both the education and health departments run by the NMSP, with
the help of some NGOs, became more actively engaged in the process of
development in Monland. The educational department has over 1,000
teachers serving over 50,000 students with the majority in primary
schools in remote areas under partial control of the NMSP.
With scarce
resources and personnel, medics from the NMSP trained in malarial
treatment are the only source of health care for villages in the rural
areas and some urban areas. These services would be cut off if
hostilities resume. Prior to the 1995 ceasefire, the health department
had accepted young people just out of high school with one-year medical
school after serving two years as volunteer in the education department.
But now many party medics who have opened clinics in these areas have
four years of medical training. MSF was the main organization working
with the health department before the international agency left Monland
last year.
If war ignites
again the situation will further deteriorate, firstly, the burden of
fighting will fall upon young people and spark an exodus of refugees
across the border and refugee camps along the border will be burnt down
as they were prior to the agreement. Civilian attacks will increase and
will be caught in the crossfire, and with the SPDC notorious for using
rape as a weapon of war, are all seen as a major deterrents to the
resumption of war. In addition, students studying at the party schools
will have to stop their education and hide in the jungle or flee human
rights violations to neighboring countries. After the ceasefire, the Mon
Education Department joined with SPDC’s universities and nurse colleges
according to the agreement. The ceasefire improved the education of many
young Mon people. According to a Mon who is now studying for his PhD in
the United States , young people in his area in eastern Monland had no
chance to attend high school before the ceasefire.
Yet for most people
in the black areas, the lack of security, lawlessness, human rights
abuses and the steady increase of land confiscations by the SPDC are
daily occurrences. Discontent is becoming more widespread with Mon
villagers and farmers fleeing to Thailand and young people have to drop
out of school due to lack of finances.
It seems that the
government incited their commanders to take more land after the
ceasefire so they would have a stronger hand in future negotiations,
says an observer. Meanwhile people from these affected areas are
frustrated with the party and the ceasefire. They complain that the
ceasefire excluded them from the negotiations and did not address their
concerns while pointing out that thousands of acres of land were
confiscated after 1996 without compensation. They want NMSP to protect
their land from the presence of SPDC troops who target them
indiscriminately. Most land confiscations occur in Ye township still
considered by SPDC as a black area or conflict zones due to Mon splinter
groups present in the southern area who sometimes launch ambushes
against SPDC troops.
The Bangkok Process
calling for a gradual transition in Burma , by the then Prime Minister
of Thailand , Thaksin Shinawatra, would have been better if the ethnic
nationalities had been consulted and if Thaksin had no business
interests in the country. In fact that was the end of the game and the
SPDC has further removed itself by creating a new capital. The move to
Pyinmana is symbolic of the inflexible approach of future negotiations
with the SPDC. Everyone is in agreement that the country is now in a
desperate situation with the problems of AIDS, poverty, lack of
education, human rights abuses, human trafficking growing rapidly every
day.
People are anxious
for a change after the insincerity of the SPDC and its forced national
reconciliation process. After the NMSP snubbed the NC invitation by
sending observers instead of representatives further angered the
government. Furthermore, the SPDC’s relations with all the groups have
soured ever since the purge of former Prime Minister Khin Nyunt who
initiated the truce with the ethnic armed groups in 1994.
The NMSP and others
are divided on these issues, but most say given there are plenty of
obstacles there is no choice but to continue on with the struggle. The
hope is now that the international community will exert more pressure on
the Burmese government as they have done recently by bringing the Burma
issue to the UN Security Council.
(The views
expressed here are solely the opinion of the author. Kao-Wao Editor)